Primary sources first
Regulatory articles begin with current FDA, European Commission, WHO, ICH, USP, pharmacopoeial, or other authoritative source material when it is publicly available.
About YB Inspection
Evidence first. Project specific. US-made.
YB Inspection develops visual inspection defect test kits, surrogate solutions, technical resources, and consulting support for pharmaceutical and biotechnology teams. The business is based in the Research Triangle region of North Carolina.
Public Accountability
What visitors can verify
Trust should come from checkable information, not stock imagery, vague superlatives, or unsupported certification language. YB Inspection publishes direct contact channels, a public company profile, dated technical articles, and linked source material.
Direct email
info@ybinspection.com
Company profile
View YB Inspection on LinkedIn
Business region
Research Triangle region, North Carolina, USA
Published work
Technical articles, references, and editable implementation frameworks
Editorial & Technical Standard
How we make technical claims
Visual inspection sits at the intersection of GMP requirements, pharmacopoeial standards, product science, process capability, and site-specific quality-system decisions. Our public material is written to preserve those distinctions.
Source status is explicit
We distinguish binding regulations from compendial standards, draft guidance, advisory recommendations, industry technical reports, and site-defined quality-system decisions.
Site decisions stay site-defined
We do not present a universal test-set size, eyesight threshold, passing score, defect mix, reject limit, or inspection speed unless the cited source actually requires it.
Tools require adaptation
Editable resources are implementation frameworks, not ready-made compliance documents. Each organization must review, approve, validate, and maintain its own procedures and acceptance criteria.
Scope Before Claims
What a quotation should define
A generic website cannot determine whether one kit, document, or service is suitable for a regulated use. Project scope should make the intended use and evidence package explicit before work begins.
Product and container configuration
Inspection method and intended use
Defect families and classification basis
Characterization and documentation deliverables
Quantity, coding, and blinding needs
Storage, handling, replacement, and lifecycle expectations
Customer protocol and acceptance-criteria responsibilities
Timeline, review points, and change-control expectations
Discuss the actual inspection problem
Use the technical quote form to share your container, fill volume, product appearance, viscosity, inspection method, defect categories, quantity, and target timeline.
Request a Technical Quote